View source for Eric Hoffer

'''Eric Hoffer''' (25 July 1902 &ndash; 21 May 1983) was an American social writer. His first book, ''[[The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements|The True Believer]]'', published in 1951, was widely recognized as a classic. This book, which he considered his best, established his reputation, and he remained a successful writer for most of his remaining years.

==Bibliography==

:1951 ''[[The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements]]'' ISBN 0060505915
:1955 ''The Passionate State Of Mind, and Other Aphorisms''
:1963 ''The Ordeal Of Change''
:1967 ''The Temper Of Our Time''
:1969 ''Working And Thinking on The Waterfront; a journal, June 1958-May 1959''
:1973 ''Reflections on the Human Condition''
:1976 ''In Our Time''
:1979 ''First Things, Last Things''
:1979 ''Before the Sabbath''
:1982 ''Between the devil and the dragon : the best essays and aphorisms of Eric Hoffer'' ISBN 0060149841
:1983 ''Truth Imagined''

==Passages from his Work==
*[http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Archives/Men%20of%20Words.htm "Men of Words"] "Men of words," according to Hoffer, are those who enjoy a facility for language who are able to rouse popular sentiment and prey upon the anger, insecurities, and confusion of the masses.

===Quotes===
* There is no doubt that in exchanging a self-centered for a selfless life we gain enormously in self-esteem.  The vanity of the selfless, even those who practice utmost humility, is boundless.  When hopes and dreams are loose on the streets, it is well for the timid to lock doors, shutter windows, and lie low until the wrath has passed.  For there is often a monstrous incongruity between the hopes, however noble and tender, and the action which follows them.  Though ours is a Godless age, it is the very opposite of irreligious.  The true believer is everywhere on the march, and both by converting and antagonizing he is shaping the world in his own image.  Whether we line up with him or against him, it is well we should know all we can concerning his nature and potentialities.
**''The True Believer'' Chapter 2 The Desire For Substitutes

* There is a fundamental difference between the appeal of a mass movement and the appeal of a practical organization. The practical organization offers opportunities for self-advancement, and its appeal is mainly to self-interest. On the other hand, a mass movement, particularly in its active, revivalist phase, appeals not to those intent on bolstering and advancing a cherished self, but to those who crave to be rid of an unwanted self. A mass movement attracts and holds a following not because it can satisfy the desire for self-advancement, but because it can satisfy the passion for self-renunciation.
**''The True Believer'' Chapter 2 The Desire For Substitutes

* Unless a man has talents to make something of himself, freedom is an irksome burden. Of what avail is freedom to choose if the self be ineffectual? We join a mass movement to escape individual responsibility, or, in the words of the ardent young Nazi, "to be free from freedom."
**Section 26, ''The True Believer''

* Where freedom is real, equality is the passion of the masses. Where equality is real, freedom is the passion of a small minority.
**Section 29, ''The True Believer''

* Failure in the management of practical affairs seems to be a qualification for success in the management of public affairs.
**Section 54, ''The True Believer''

* It is startling to realize how much unbelief is necessary to make belief possible. What we know as blind faith is sustained by innumerable unbeliefs.
**Section 56, ''The True Believer''

* The urge to escape our real self is also an urge to escape the rational and the obvious.  The refusal to see ourselves as we are develops a distaste for facts and cold logic.  There is no hope for the frustrated in the actual and the possible.  Salvation can come to them only from the miraculous, which seeps through a crack in the iron wall of inexorable reality.  They ask to be deceived.  What [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Stresemann Stresemann] said of the Germans is true of the frustrated in general:  "[They] pray not only for [their] daily bread, but also for [their] daily illusion."<sup>21</sup>  The rule seems to be that those who find difficulty in deceiving themselves are easily deceived by others.  They are easily pursuaded and led.
**Section 59, ''The True Believer''

* The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not.
**Section 62, ''The True Believer''

* Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without belief in a devil.
**Section 65, ''The True Believer''

* Self-righteousness is a loud din raised to drown the voice of guilt within us.
**Section 69, ''The True Believer''

* Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness of their lives try to find a new content not only by dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by nursing a fanatical grievance. A mass movement offers them unlimited opportunities for both.
**Section 75, ''The True Believer''

* The frustrated follow a leader less because of their faith that he is leading them to a promised land than because of their immediate feeling that he is leading them away from their unwanted selves. Surrender to a leader is not a means to an end but a fulfillment. Whither they are led is of secondary importance.
**Section 94, ''The True Believer''

* The awareness of their individual blemishes and shortcomings inclines the frustrated to detect ill will and meanness in their fellow men. Self-contempt, however vague, sharpens our eyes for the imperfections of others. '''We usually strive to reveal in others the blemishes we hide in ourselves.'''
**Section 100, ''The True Believer''

* Collective unity is not the result of the brotherly love of the faithful for each other. The loyalty of the true believer is to the whole— the church, party, nation— and not to his fellow true believer. True loyalty between individuals is possible only in a loose and relatively free society. 
**Section 101, ''The True Believer''

* The significant point is that people unfit for freedom--who cannot do much with it--are hungry for power. The desire for freedom is an attribute of a 'have" type of self. It says: leave me alone and I shall grow, learn, and realize my capacities. The desire for power is basically an attribute of a 'have-not" type of self. If Hitler had had the talents and the temperament of a genuine artist, if Stalin had had the capacity to become a first-rate theoretician, if Napoleon had had the makings of a great poet or philosopher they would hardly have developed the all-consuming lust for absolute power. 
Freedom gives us a chance to realize our human and individual uniqueness. Absolute power can also bestow uniqueness: to have absolute power is to have the power to reduce all the people around us to puppets, robots, toys, or animals, and be the only man in sight. Absolute power achieves uniqueness by dehumanizing others. 
To sum up: Those who lack the capacity to achieve much in an atmosphere of freedom will clamor for power. 
*''Working and Thinking on the Waterfront'', March 28,  1959

* There is in even the most selfish passion a large element of self-abnegation.  It is startling to realize that what we call extreme self-seeking is actually self-renunciation.  The miser, health addict, glory chaser and their like are not far behind the selfless in the exercise of self-sacrifice.

* If in order to keep the wheels turning you have to deafen ears with propaganda, crack the whip of Terror, and keep pushing people around, then you haven't got a machine civilization no matter how numerous and ingenious your machines.
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 5 "The Readiness to Work"

* It has often been said that power corrupts.  But it is perhaps equally important to realize that weakness, too, corrupts. Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.  Hatred, malice, rudeness, intolerance, and suspicion are the faults of weakness.  The resentment of the weak does not spring from any injustice done to them but from the sense of inadequacy and impotence.  We cannot win the weak by sharing our wealth with them.  They feel our generosity as oppression.  St. Vincent De Paul cautioned his disciples to deport themselves so that the poor "will forgive them the bread you give them."
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 2 "The Awakening of Asia"

* It is easier to love humanity as a whole than to love lone's neighbor. There may even be a certain antagonism between love of humanity and love of neighbor; a low capacity for getting along with those near us often goes hand in hand with a high receptivity to the idea of the brotherhood of men.  About a hundred years ago a Russian landowner by the name of Petrashevsky recorded a remarkable conclusion: "Finding nothing worthy of my attachment either among women or among men, I have vowed myself to the service of mankind." He became a follower of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Fourier Fourier], and installed a phalanstery on his estate. The end of the experiment was sad, but what one might perhaps have expected: the peasants--Petrashevsky's neighbors-burned the phalanstery. 

Some of the worst tyrannies of our day genuinely are "vowed" to the service of mankind, yet can function only by pitting neighbor against neighbor. The all-seeing eye of a totalitarian regime is usually the watchful eye of the next-door neighbor. In a Communist state love of neighbor may be classed as counter-revolutionary.
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 11 ‘Brotherhood’

* In exceptional cases, like Puerto Rico and Israel, where capital and skills are available, rapid modernization is not incompatible with a considerable measure of individual freedom. 

To some extent, the present dominant role of the intellectual in the modernization of backward countries also militates against the prevalence of individual freedom. Not only does the intellectual's penchant for tutoring, directing, and regulating promote a regimented social pattern, but his craving for the momentous is bound to foster an austere seriousness inhospitable to the full play of freedom. The intellectual "transforms the prosaic achievements of society into Promethean tasks, glorious defeats, tragic epics." <nowiki>*</nowiki> The strained atmosphere of an eternal drama working up toward a climax and a crisis is optimal for heroes and saints but not for the autonomous individual shaping his life to the best of his ability. The chances are that should an advanced country come into the keeping of the intellectual it would begin to show many of the hectic traits which seem to us characteristic of a backward country in the throes of awakening.
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Raymond Aron, The Opium of the Intellectuals (Garden City. N.Y.: Doubleday. 1957). p. xiv.
*The Ordeal of Change Chapter 12 'Concerning Individual Freedom’

* He would rather "work, fight, talk, for liberty than have it.” <nowiki>*</nowiki> The fact is that up to now the free society has not been good for the intellectual. It has neither accorded him a superior status to sustain his confidence nor made it easy for him to acquire an unquestioned sense of social usefulness. For he derives his sense of usefulness mainly from directing, instructing, and planning-from minding other people's business-and is bound to feel superfluous and neglected where people believe themselves competent to manage individual and communal affairs, and are impatient of supervision and regulation. A free society is as much a threat to the intellectual's sense of worth as an automated economy is to the workingman's sense of worth. Any social order that can function with a minimum of leadership will be anathema to the intellectual. 

The intellectual craves a social order in which uncommon people perform uncommon tasks every day. He wants a society throbbing with dedication, reverence, and worship. He sees it as scandalous that the discoveries of science and the feats of heroes should have as their denouement the comfort and affluence of common folk. A social order run by and for the people is to him a mindless organism motivated by sheer physiologism.
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Lincoln Steffens, The Autobiography of Lincoln Steffens (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1931), p. 635. 
*The Ordeal of Change Chapter 12 'Concerning Individual Freedom’

* The explosive component in the contemporary scene is not the clamor of the masses but the self-righteous claims of a multitude of graduates from schools and universities. This army of scribes is clamoring for a society in which planning, regulation, and supervision are paramount and the prerogative of the educated. They hanker for the scribe's golden age, for a return to something like the scribe-dominated societies of ancient Egypt, China, and Europe of the Middle Ages. There is little doubt that the present trend in the new and renovated countries toward social regimentation stems partly from the need to create adequate employment for a large number of scribes. And since the tempo of the production of the literate is continually increasing, the prospect is of ever-swelling bureaucracies. 
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 13 'Scribe, Writer, and Rebel'

* It has been often stated that a social order is likely to be stable so long as it gives scope to talent. Actually, it is the ability to give scope to the untalented that is most vital in maintaining social stability. For not only are the untalented more numerous but, since they cannot trans- mute their grievances into a creative effort, their disaffection will be more pronounced and explosive. Thus the most troublesome problem which confronts social engineering is how to provide for the untalented and, what is equally important, how to provide against them. For there is a tendency in the untalented to divert their energies from their own development into the management, manipulation, and probably frustration of others. They want to police, instruct, guide, and meddle. In an adequate social order, the untalented should be able to acquire a sense of usefulness and of growth without interfering with the development of talent around them. This requires, first, an abundance of opportunities for purposeful action and self advancement. Secondly, a wide diffusion of technical and social skills so that people will be able to work and manage their affairs with a minimum of tutelage. The scribe mentality is best neutralized by canalizing energies into purposeful and useful pursuits, and by raising the cultural level of the whole population so as to blur the dividing line between the educated and the uneducated. If such an arrangement lacks provisions for the encouragement of the talented it yet has the merit of not interfering with them. 
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 13 'Scribe, Writer, and Rebel'

* One should see the dominant role of the weak in shaping man's fate not as a perversion of natural instincts and vital impulses, but as the starting point of the deviation which led man to break away from, and rise above, nature-not as degeneration but as the generation of a new order of creation.

The corruption inherent in absolute power derives from the fact that such power is never free from the tendency to turn man into a thing, and press him back into the matrix of nature from which he has risen. For the impulse of power is to turn every variable into a constant, and give to commands the inexorableness and relentlessness of laws of nature. Hence absolute power corrupts even when exercised for humane purposes. The benevolent despot who sees himself as a shepherd of the people still demands from others the submissiveness of sheep. The taint inherent in absolute power is not its inhumanity but its antihumanity. 
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 15 'The Unnaturalness Of Human Nature'

* The weak are not a noble breed. Their sublime deeds of faith, daring, and self-sacrifice usually spring from questionable motives. The weak hate not wickedness but weakness; and one instance of their hatred of weakness is hatred of self. All the passionate pursuits of the weak are in some degree a striving to escape, blur, or disguise an unwanted self. It is a striving shot through with malice, envy, self-deception, and a host of petty impulses; yet it often culminates in superb achievements. Thus we find that people who fail in everyday affairs often show a tendency to reach out for the impossible. They become responsive to grandiose schemes, and will display unequaled steadfastness, formidable energies and a special fitness in the performance of tasks which would stump superior people. It seems paradoxical that defeat in dealing with the possible should embolden people to attempt the impossible, but a familiarity with the mentality of the weak reveals that what seems a path of daring is actually an easy way out: It is to escape the responsibility for failure that the weak so eagerly throw themselves into grandiose under- takings. For when we fail in attaining the possible the blame is solely ours, but when we fail in attaining the impossible we are justified in attributing it to the magnitude of the task.
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 15 'The Unnaturalness Of Human Nature'

* The urge to escape our real self is also an urge to escape the rational and the obvious.  The refusal to see ourselves as we are develops a distaste for facts and cold logic.  There is no hope for the frustrated in the actual and the possible.  Salvation can come to them only from the miraculous, which seeps through a crack in the iron wall of inexorable reality.  Ther is never free from the tendency to turn man into a thing, and press him back into the matrix of nature from which he has risen. For the impulse of power is to turn every variable into a constant, and give to commands the inexorableness and relentlessness of laws of nature. Hence absolute power corrupts even when exercised for humane purposes. The benevolent despot who sees himself as a shepherd of the people still demands from others the submissiveness of sheep. The taint inherent in absolute power is not its inhumanity but its antihumanity. 
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 15 'The Unnaturalness Of Human Nature'

* The weak are not a noble breed. Their sublime deeds of faith, daring, and self-sacrifice usually spring from questionable motives. The weak hate not wickedness but weakness; and one instance of their hatred of weakness is hatred of self. All the passionate pursuits of the weak are in some degree a striving to escape, blur, or disguise an unwanted self. It is a striving shot through with malice, envy, self-deception, and a host of petty impulses; yet it often culminates in superb achievements. Thus we find that people who fail in everyday affairs often show a tendency to reach out for the impossible. They become responsive to grandiose schemes, and will display unequaled steadfastness, formidable energies and a special fitness in the performance of tasks which would stump superior people. It seems paradoxical that defeat in dealing with the possible should embolden people to attempt the impossible, but a familiarity with the mentality of the weak reveals that what seems a path of daring is actually an easy way out: It is to escape the responsibility for failure that the weak so eagerly throw themselves into grandiose under- takings. For when we fail in attaining the possible the blame is solely ours, but when we fail in attaining the impossible we are justified in attributing it to the magnitude of the task.
**''The Ordeal of Change'' Chapter 15 'The Unnaturalness Of Human Nature'

Every extreme attitude is a flight from the self. 
**Section 8, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* It has often been said that power corrupts.  But it is perhaps equally important to realize that weakness, too, corrupts. Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.  Hatred, malice, rudeness, intolerance, and suspicion are the faults of weakness.  The resentment of the weak does not spring from any injustice done to them but from the sense of inadequacy and impotence.  They hate not wickedness but weakness.  When it is their power to do so, the weak destroy weakness wherever they see it.
**Section 42, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* God alone is satisfied with what He is and can proclaim:  "I am what I am."  Unlike God, man strives with all his might to be what he is not.  He incessantly proclaims:  "I am what I am not."
**Section 54, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

*To most of us nothing is so invisible as unpleasant truth.
**Section 59, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* The weakness of a soul is proportionate to the number of truths that must be kept from it.
**Section 61, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* We lie loudest when we lie to ourselves.
**Section 70, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* When people are free to do as we please, they usually imitate each other.
**Section 33, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* Whenever we proclaim the uniqueness of a religion, a truth, a leader, a nation, a race, a part or a holy cause, we are also proclaiming our own uniqueness.
**Section 37, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* The remarkable thing is that we really love our neighbor as ourselves: we do unto others as we do unto ourselves. We hate others when we hate ourselves. We are tolerant toward others when we tolerate ourselves. We forgive others when we forgive ourselves. We are prone to sacrifice others when we are ready to sacrifice ourselves.

It is not love of self but hatred of self which is at the root of the troubles that afflict our world.
**Section 100, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

*  '''The real “haves” are they who can acquire freedom, self-confidence, and even riches without depriving others of them. They acquire all of these by developing and applying their potentialities. On the other hand, the real “have nots” are they who cannot have aught except by depriving others of it. They can feel free only by diminishing the freedom of others, self-confident by spreading fear and dependence among others, and rich by making others poor.'''
**Section 115, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* Compassion is probably the only antitoxin of the soul.  Where there is compassion even the most poisonous impulses remain relatively harmless.  One would rather see the world run by men who set their hearts on toys but are accessible to pity, than by men animated by lofty ideals whose dedication makes them ruthless.  In the chemistry on man's soul, almost all noble attributes&mdash;courage, honor, hope, faith, duty, loyalty, ect.&mdash;can be transmuted into ruthlessness.  Compassion alone stands apart from the continuous traffic between good and evil proceeeding within us.
**Section 139, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* The only index by which to judge a government or a way of life is by the quality of the people it acts upon. No matter how noble the objectives of a government, if it blurs decency and kindness, cheapens human life, and breeds ill will and suspicion&mdash;it is an evil government.
**Section 147, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* No one is truly literate who cannot read his own heart.
**Section 159, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength.
**Section 241, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* There are many who find a good alibi far more attractive than an achievement. For an achievement does not settle anything permanently. We still have to prove our worth anew each day: we have to prove that we are as good today as we were yesterday. But when we have a valid alibi for not achieving anything we are fixed, so to speak, for life. Moreover, when we have an alibi for not writing a book, painting a picture, and so on, we have an alibi for not writing the greatest book and not painting the greatest picture. Small wonder that the effort expended and the punishment endured in obtaining a good alibi often exceed the effort and grief requisite for the attainment of a most marked achievement.
**Section 181, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* Add a few drops of venom to a half truth and you have an absolute truth.
**Section 216, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.
**Section 222, ''The Passionate State of Mind and other aphorisms''

* Nature has no compassion. Nature accepts no excuses and the only punishment it knows is death.
**Section 36, ''Reflections on the Human Condition'' (1973)

*An empty head is not really empty; it is stuffed with rubbish. Hence the difficulty of forcing anything into an empty head.
**''Reflections on the Human Condition'' p. 54 (1974)

* The Renaissance was a time of mercenary soldiers, ours is a time of mercenary labor.
**''Before the Sabbath'' (1979)

===Attributed===
* Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power.

* Animals can learn, but it is not by learning that they become dogs, cats, or horses. Only man has to learn to become what he is supposed to be.

* Good and evil grow up together and are bound in an equilibrium that cannot be sundered. The most we can do is try to tilt the equilibrium toward the good.

* It is the individual alone who is timeless. The individual's hungers, anxieties, dreams, and preoccupations have remained unchanged throughout the millennia.

* I can never forget that one of the most gifted, best educated nations in the world, of its own free will, surrendered its fate into the hands of a maniac.
** (on German acceptance of Hitler in the 1930's)

* In a time of drastic change it is the learners who inherit the future. The learned usually find themselves equipped to live in a world that no longer exists.

* It is doubtful if the oppressed ever fight for freedom. They fight for pride and power&mdash;power to oppress others. The oppressed want above all to imitate their oppressors; they want to retaliate.

* Kindness can become its own motive.  We are made kind by being kind.

* Religion and nationalism, as well as any custom and any belief however absurd and degrading, if it only connects the individual with others, are refuges from what man most dreads: isolation. 

* Religion is not a matter of God, church, holy cause, etc. These are but accessories. The source of religious preoccupation is in the self, or rather the rejection of the self. Dedication is the obverse side of self-rejection. Man alone is a religious animal because, as Montaigne points out, "it is a malady confined to man, and not seen in any other creature, to hate and despise ourselves." 
 
* The aspiration toward freedom is the most essentially human of all human manifestations.

* The desire to belong is partly a desire to lose oneself. 

* The end comes when we no longer talk with ourselves. It is the end of genuine thinking and the beginning of the final loneliness. The remarkable thing is that the cessation of the inner dialogue marks also the end of our concern with the world around us. It is as if we noted the world and think about it only when we have to report it to ourselves.

* The individual’s most vital need is to prove his worth, and this usually means an insatiable hunger for action. For it is only the few who can acquire a sense of worth by developing and employing their capacities and talents. The majority prove their worth by keeping busy.

* The less satisfaction we derive from being ourselves, the greater is our desire to be like others.

==External links==
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Hoffer Wikipedia article on '''Eric Hoffer''']
* [http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Eric_Hoffer Wikiquotes from '''Eric Hoffer''']
* [http://www.makeoutcity.com/Categories/People/EricHoffer/ makeoutcity.com: Categories > People > EricHoffer]
* [http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20030618.shtml Thomas Sowell: The legacy of Eric Hoffer]
* [http://students.berkeley.edu/fao/prizes/proselili.html Fabilli and Hoffer Essay Prize]
* [http://www.philosophynow.org/archive/articles/34madigan1.htm The True Believer Revisited] Tim Madigan in Philosophy''Now''
* [http://erichoffer.blogspot.com Eric Hoffer Blog (Searchable quotes)]
* [http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Eric_Hoffer Eric Hoffer Quotes]

[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Authors]]