Difference between revisions of "Category:Linguistics"

From Christoph's Personal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links)
(External links)
Line 85: Line 85:
 
*[http://www.kent.k12.wa.us/ksd/MA/resources/greek_and_latin_roots/transition.html Greek and Latin roots]
 
*[http://www.kent.k12.wa.us/ksd/MA/resources/greek_and_latin_roots/transition.html Greek and Latin roots]
 
*[http://www.dumblittleman.com/2007/07/50-tools-that-can-improve-your-writing.html 50 Tools that can Improve your Writing Skills]
 
*[http://www.dumblittleman.com/2007/07/50-tools-that-can-improve-your-writing.html 50 Tools that can Improve your Writing Skills]
 +
===Software===
 +
*[http://linguistlist.org/sp/Software.html Linguist List]
  
 
===Wikipedia articles on Linguistics===
 
===Wikipedia articles on Linguistics===

Revision as of 23:48, 31 August 2007

Linguistics is the scientific study of human language, and someone who engages in this study is called a linguist or linguistician.

I am very interested in this field, but more of as a hobby than as a career. In any case, I will document what I learn about this field in this category.

I also speak a few languages and am learning more. Below is a list of the languages I speak either fluently or with a working knowledge (and continually improving):

  • English (mother-tongue)
  • German (college level)
  • Spanish (college level)

George Orwell's writing advice

Note: From George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" (see also: wikipedia:Politics and the English Language for background information).

A scrupulous writer, in every sentence that he writes, will ask himself at least four questions, thus:

  1. What am I trying to say?
  2. What words will express it?
  3. What image or idiom will make it clearer?
  4. Is this image fresh enough to have an effect?

And he will probably ask himself two more:

  1. Could I put it more shortly?
  2. Have I said anything that is avoidably ugly?

One can often be in doubt about the effect of a word or a phrase, and one needs rules that one can rely on when instinct fails. I think the following rules will cover most cases:

  1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
  2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
  3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
  4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
  5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
  6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

Double meaning

  • The bandage was wound around the wound.
  • The farm was used to produce produce.
  • The dump was so full that it had to refuse more refuse.
  • We must polish the Polish furniture.
  • He could lead if he would get the lead out.
  • The soldier decided to desert his dessert in the desert.
  • Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
  • A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum
  • When shot at, the dove dove into the bushes.
  • I did not object to the object.
  • The insurance was invalid for the invalid.
  • There was a row among the oarsmen about how to row.
  • They were too close to the door to close it.
  • The buck does funny things when the does are present.
  • A seamstress and a sewer fell down into a sewer line.
  • To help with planting, the farmer taught his sow to sow.
  • The wind was too strong to wind the sail.
  • Upon seeing the tear in the painting I shed a tear.
  • I had to subject the subject to a series of tests.
  • How can I intimate this to my most intimate friend?

External links

Software

Wikipedia articles on Linguistics

Lists

UTF-8

Algorithms

Subcategories

This category has only the following subcategory.